Not Good...

A forum for the discussion of actual scientific events, phenomena, space-related news, etc.

Moderator: Vincent

Post Reply
bnaivar
Camper
Camper
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:48 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Not Good...

Post by bnaivar »

Outstanding Trainee Award-Adult Space Academy Sept. '90
Best Mission-Parent & Child Space Camp
Right Stuff Award-Adult Space Academy
Most Enthusiastic-Adult Space Academy
Best Mission-Adult Alumni Weekend June '08
User avatar
Boomerang
Counselor
Counselor
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 8:36 pm
Location: Elizabethtown Kentucky

Post by Boomerang »

Admittedly that looks pretty bad. However we all know the economy is the pits right now. If Obama sticks to promises of continuing the program which is in doubt that may include budget increses. His next NASA budget proposal as i recall did include some increase. Though it isnt enough according to the Augustine commission. I think the best bet will be to wait and see what the final Augustine commission reporst says later this month. Theyy have some interesting ideas layed out for future missions some with Orion others without. I personaly would love to see us go back to the moon and on to mars i think we all would. However as excited as i was when Bush gave his speach about returning to the moon my first thought was it would take several presidents to accomplish the goal and it will likely change. My biggest hope for the program was to atleast get a more robust and safer vehicle than the shuttle with a real escape system for the crew then go from their. Orion meets that criteria even if it mean low earth orbit first then moving on later. I hope they don't give up on any of the goals set forth by Bush completely. But with the money the way it is it may take a longer more stretched out approach to do it or as the Augustine commission pointed out it may take alot more work with private industry.

On that note this is an intresting story i just read this morning on a purely Earth orbit version of Orion designed by Bigelow Aerospace that could be flown with a crew of up to 7 to the ISS launched on an existing Atlas V expendable rocket. This could be a potentialy cheaper stepping stone and has been proposed to Lockheed Martin and NASA and it sounds like possibly the Augustine commission. We will just have to see. http://www.space.com/businesstechnology ... -lite.html
Jason original callsign Loverboy
SC 1991
SA Level 1 1993
AC Intermediate 1996
ASA 1998
Corporate Space Camp 2005
AC Counselor Summer 07 callsign Boomerang
Adult Alumni Camp 2007
Adult Alumni Camp 2008
Official Space Camp Ambassador
Mercergl
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by Mercergl »

I have a couple of thoughts on this: one is that I find it a little disturbing that the first comment on the article is by one of those we-didn't-go-to-the-moon idiots. Second is that there is so much going on in the government right now, with so much of it going so poorly, I'm afraid that too much of the space exploration budget will fall victim to other tremendously expensive endeavors. Without getting too political, I wonder why while we're pouring money into certain financial institutions, we couldn't put some money towards, say, the moon and Mars? Ok, done with that. Anyway, I'm worried that because of the economy, the space program will suffer. The technology that comes out of the space program returns far more than is put into it, though. I agree with pretty much everything boomerang said. If more time is needed, so be it. Let's just hope they stick with that budget increase and have some perseverence.

Edit: I think the "lite" Orion is a near idea, reminds me of Gemini as a step up to Apollo but, uh, mid air capture? Yeah, that idea needs some work.
Don't Panic
-The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy

Space Academy 6 Day- Week 39 2006
Space Academy 8 Day- Week 40 2007
Advanced Academy 8 Day- Week 40 2008
Advanced Academy 6 Day- Week 40 2009
Post Reply